Follow-up Comment #3, bug #62950 (project groff): That sounds good. Is this something you've already implemented but just not pushed yet?
One possible advantage to Ralph's idea is that no validity checking need be done until a font is actually called upon in a document, whereas all must be checked up front with the system sketched in comment #2. Still, I imagine the performance difference, even on a system that has several hundred entries in its download files, would be negligible. A nice thing about perl is it makes "complicated" data structures easy to implement. I read Ralph's idea as using a hash where each value is an array rather than a scalar--that is, more a hash of arrays than an array of hashes. (On the other hand, I've written perl code that used the latter structure but not the former, so I perhaps shouldn't blithely declare they're both equally simple to implement.) _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62950> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/