Follow-up Comment #1, bug #63827 (project groff): bug #63133 comment #5: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63133#comment5> > Bug #63827 is now open to track the removal of pdfmark from the > groff git repository. The following is more relevant to that bug, > but I'm starting it here because it's a reply to a comment here, > and Keith is already cc:ed here. > > comment #3: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63133#comment3> > > Agreed. I have, indeed, added significant new content to > > pdfmark.pdf, (via pdfmark.ms), and some pdfroff enhancements, > > which are not now included in groff's contrib/pdfmark tree. > > There have also been 12 commits that have touched groff's > contrib/pdfmark tree since the 2021-11-13 creation of the OSDN > pdfmark, according to: > > git log --since 2021-11-13 contrib/pdfmark > > I presume these haven't been reflected in OSDN. Some have, albeit not in exactly the same manner; some of the others, I will address shortly. > Many of them are part of larger changes to the groff code base, > and may or may not be necessary Those which impact, primarily, on the build infrastructure, are irrelevant; I do not use automake, (and will not entertain doing so); I *do* use GNU make, and make no apology for introducing GNU make specific constructs, within my makefile. > to keep the two interoperating happily, but someone familiar with > the code will have to make that call for each change. I'll be happy to look into any concerns; please feel free to bring any to my attention, either by commenting on this ticket, or by opening one on my OSDN groff-pdfmark ticket page <https://osdn.net/users/keith/pf/groff-pdfmark/ticket>; (you may need to create a personal OSDN account, for the latter). > (This presumes that the OSDN repository was created from the latest > groff git contrib/pdfmark at the time; It was. > if it was spawned from another source, there might be more > divergence.) Everything, up to the date of the fork, I have captured. Some changes, since then I already have captured, in some shape or form; some others, (at least one of which looks suspiciously wrong, to me), I may need to address.
_______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63827> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/