Follow-up Comment #6, bug #63812 (project groff):
[comment #5 comment #5:] > The projected likelihood of introducing such a backwards-incompatible feature is marginal at best, and indicative of feature creep at worst. Muahahahaha. You don't know of my plans for groff 1.24. Long stories short, I want a `for` request that will iterate over macros/strings/diversions, and new conditional operators to test for "nodes" and for glyphs that are _actually defined_ in the current font, as opposed to interposed via character definitions. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63812> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/