Follow-up Comment #13, bug #63777 (project groff):
Not worth reopening this bug report over, but I notice this point still isn't
covered by the documentation update:
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> A horizontal motion of zero length [...] _is_ output, and
> I would expect it to cause a page transition if one is in the
> twilight zone. And it does.
Granted, the case that the manual was updated to cover (that of a break, which
might be a side effect of a number of requests) is a plausible situation where
one might cause an inadvertent transition to the first page, while the one you
cite is...a bit contrived--but nonetheless, I think, not obvious. Is it thus
worth documenting? Dunno, I'm on the fence about that, but I'm bringing it up
to get (an)other opinion(s).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63777>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
