Follow-up Comment #17, bug #63958 (project groff):
Well, maybe one thing. SYNOPSIS is not justified in nroff/UCB mdoc: (this is
with the latest commit to change the continuation indent already applied)
SYNOPSIS
timerdday [-+abCefhiklmnprUuvXx] [-+o option] [-T [!]tty|-] [file [arg1
...]]
timerdday [-+abCefhiklmnprUuvXx] [-+o option] [-T [!]tty|-] -c cmd [arg0
...]
builtin-name foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar
[argument ...]
SYNOPSIS
void
timerdday(struct-timespec *earliest, struct-timespec *latest,
struct-timespec *resolution);
void
tm(struct-timespec *earliest, struct-timespec *latest,
struct-timespec *resolution);
… but it is in gnroff, looking bad:
SYNOPSIS
timerdday [-+abCefhiklmnprUuvXx] [-+o option] [-T
[!]tty|-]
[file [arg1 ...]]
timerdday [-+abCefhiklmnprUuvXx] [-+o option] [-T [!]tty|-] -c
cmd
[arg0 ...]
builtin‐name foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar foobar
foobar
[argument ...]
SYNOPSIS
void
timerdday(struct-timespec *earliest, struct-timespec
*latest,
struct-timespec *resolution);
void
tm(struct-timespec *earliest, struct-timespec
*latest,
struct-timespec *resolution);
I’m normally very much a fan of justified paragraphs, just maybe not for the
SYNOPSIS…
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63958>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
