Follow-up Comment #8, bug#51072 (group groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > > [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=7252c3db > > Commit 7252c3db], which resolved that bug, did include an > > example of how to interleave macro definitions. I'm not sure > > whether a similar example, of a diversion definition spanning > > macros, would be a valuable addition to the Texinfo manual's > > diversion section, or would just bloat it. > > There is room in our Texinfo manual to be discursive.
This, then, remains to be done. Everything else comment #5 covered seems to have been handled back in February 2022. > the above might be more appropriately placed > in roff(7) since that page is supposed to discuss "concepts", This was done in [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=9e35aac37 commit 9e35aac37]. > I think with a little bridging material, the above could be > spliced into our Texinfo manual. I envision a brief section > between the "Drawing Requests" and "Traps" sections, titled > something like "Planning Ahead" for "Formatting for Later". Done (the section being named "Deferring Output") in [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=85c597a12 commit 85c597a12]. > the "Colors" section/node seems to > come much later than it could. It should be relocated earlier, > no later than "Sizes". Done in [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=1b93f610e commit 1b93f610e]. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51072> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/