Update of bug #60260 (group groff):
Item Group: Incorrect behaviour => Warning/Suspicious
behaviour
Status: Invalid => Duplicate
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #7:
[comment #6 comment #6:]
> To the extent that this ticket claims an incompatibility between
> AT&T _troff_ and GNU _troff_, it is invalid.
The ticket _didn't_ claim that until two days ago. Its summary for its first
three years was "Incorrect warnings of dangling .el with bracket-less
nesting", which is either valid or not depending on where you come down on the
debate in #65474.
> To the extent that it claims that GNU _troff_'s `el` warning can
> be misleading, I agree; but it is then a duplicate of bug #65474.
That being the complaint originally filed, I've changed the resolution to
Duplicate.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60260>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
