Follow-up Comment #11, bug #59442 (group groff): It sounds like a decision is needed on which is the cart and which the horse. Should this bug take priority -- as comment #1 points out, "The whole point of soelim is to get preprocessors to run on `.so`ed files" -- and then bug #65108 has to figure out how to work within that framework? Or should filename handling take priority, and then this bug needs to figure out how to implement the comment #1 precept within that new framework?
_______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59442> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/