Follow-up Comment #11, bug #59442 (group groff):
It sounds like a decision is needed on which is the cart and which the horse.
Should this bug take priority -- as comment #1 points out, "The whole point of
soelim is to get preprocessors to run on `.so`ed files" -- and then bug #65108
has to figure out how to work within that framework? Or should filename
handling take priority, and then this bug needs to figure out how to implement
the comment #1 precept within that new framework?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59442>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/