Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66051 (group groff): It makes total sense and also seems a duplicate of bug #42870. I guess I'm not seeing what's "more modest" about that one.
If anything, the way it's worded, _this_ one seems more modest, as it's asking
for support of only special characters, and only for .hcode, whereas #42870
(per its original submission wording) asks for support of "any characters
entities," for .hw and .hcode.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66051>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
