Follow-up Comment #15, bug #63827 (group groff): A little detangling from _mom_(7) will be necessary.
$ git grep 'gropdf-info'
contrib/mom/om.tmac:. if !dpdf:href.map .tm gropdf-info:href
\\*[PDF_NM2] \\*[PDF_TX]
contrib/mom/om.tmac:. if '\\*[.T]'ps' .if !dpdf:href.map .tm
gropdf-info:href \\*[ARG_1] \\$*
contrib/pdfmark/pdfmark.tmac:.ie '\\n(.z'' .tm gropdf-info:href
\\*[PDFHREF.NAME] \\$*
contrib/pdfmark/pdfroff.sh: $AWK '/^gropdf-info:href/ {$1 = ".pdfhref D
-N"; print}' $WRKFILE > $REFFILE
I'm wondering how much we really have to do differently for the "ps" and "pdf"
devices. Since "pdfmark" commands have their device controls prefixed with
"ps: exec", I wonder if they're syntactically valid PostScript language that
just happens not to be interpreted by most PostScript interpreters. If that's
correct, it would explain why transformations à la the _ps2pdf_(1) command
are not more lossy than they are.
Deri, does that sound right to you?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63827>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
