Follow-up Comment #38, bug #66583 (group groff): [comment #30 comment #30:] > The patches are attached. > > This seems a superior way of implementing this compared to the > two patches I have submitted before.
As a point of order, this bug is currently closed.
Do your attached patches fall under the jurisdiction of this bug, meaning I
should reopen it? Or are they more properly part of bug #66609 and/or bug
#66611, meaning you should attach them there?
I believe the referenced "two patches I have submitted before" refer to those
of #66609 and #66611, meaning your new patches here supersede the ones posted
there, but it's unclear to me which problem set they solve.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66583>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
