Follow-up Comment #11, bug #66700 (group groff):
[comment #5 comment #5:]
> At 2025-01-23T08:32:23-0500, Deri James wrote:
>> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #66700 (group groff):
>>
>> Does this mean that adding a valid unit specifier to a valid single
>> character named register is no longer accepted?
>
> It's "accepted", but warned about. The (non-)interpretaton of excess
> scaling units has not changed. You will notice that the commit did not
> change the _semantics_ of numeric expression interpretation.
>
[...]
>
>> Or am I reading too much into this patch?
>
> Possibly.
Yes, it was definitely me that was wrong (in both regards).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66700>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
