Follow-up Comment #39, bug #66392 (group groff): At 2025-02-07T19:25:31-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote: >> Hence my saying that deferring bug #66387 until post-1.24 is the >> path of least resistance. (Other than your resistance to it. :) > > Seems as if every time I go to say something on this thread, Dave > beats me to it. Yes, Dave, you are absolutely correct. The change > needs to be reverted
Okay, you've drawn a line in the sand. I'll proceed with an undo, not
necessarily a "git revert", as I think I want to keep the automated test
that was part of the commit (or maybe not, maybe I added it in a
separate commit before)...either way, I'll add that test to the "XFAIL"
list so that it's easy to tell in the future if/when the functionality
comes and goes.
> and the issue resolved after 1.24 is released.
How would reverting the change not resolve this ticket?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66392>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
