Update of bug #62916 (group groff):
Summary: list things to deprecate => list incompatible
changes under consideration for future groff releases
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #16:
[comment #15 comment #15:]
> I regard "deprecations" as a proper subset of incompatible changes.
Me too, hence my wording in comment #12 suggesting "generalizing" the list
from the former to the latter.
> Should we retitle this ticket to "incompatible changes under
> consideration for groff 1.25"?
I don't think everything on this list is being considered for 1.25, so I'd
change that to say "a future groff release," but otherwise this makes sense.
Actually, I'll just go ahead and do that now.
> I'd propose we not leave the ticket open in perpetuity,
Agreed; I figured once this list existed in the source tree, that would
replace this ticket as the repository for these proposals.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62916>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
