Update of bug #67380 (group groff):
Status: Fixed => None
Open/Closed: Closed => Open
Planned Release: 1.24.0 => None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #3:
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> Is it also worth documenting (in groff_diff(7), probably) that predecessor
> roffs also don't flush even some fully collected lines?
Quite possibly.
But more worryingly, I'm wrong about `fl` even in GNU _troff_.
$ cat ATTIC/no-break-flush-experiment.roff
Sed ut perspiciatis,
'fl
.ab
unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem
accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam eaque ipsa, quae ab
illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt,
explicabo.
$ ./build/test-groff -Tascii -Z ATTIC/no-break-flush-experiment.roff
x T ascii
x res 240 24 40
x init
p1
x trailer
V2640
x stop
$ ~/groff-1.22.3/bin/groff -Tascii -Z ATTIC/no-break-flush-experiment.roff
x T ascii
x res 240 24 40
x init
p1
x trailer
V2640
x stop
User Abort.
That was not what I expected.
Reopening, albeit abusively of the original report, since I've hijacked the
topic from `ab` to `fl`.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67380>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
