Follow-up Comment #4, bug #67693 (group groff):

[comment #3 comment #3:]
> I also don't want _groff_ documentation to pretend that some
> typographers really do speak in the former manner.

Is this a disagreement with the thread cited in comment #1?  Or is there a
missing negative in that sentence?

>> So I'll close this ticket unless someone objects.
> 
> None from me.

OK.  I'll give the submitter a few days to respond.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67693>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to