Follow-up Comment #1, bug #67735 (group groff):

[comment #0 original submission:]
> And that in turn is necessary for resolution of bug #40720.

Not if that resolution is implemented as Ingo and I discuss in comments 4-6
there.

(Not an argument against fixing this, just its relation to #40720.)


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67735>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to