Follow-up Comment #14, bug #40720 (group groff): My comment #12 meant, perhaps too ambiguously, to refer to my remark in comment #5, "the above paragraphs seem to, effectively, entail integrating preconv into the part of groff that reads input," and Ingo's comment #6 response, "that is exactly what mandoc(1) has been doing for more than ten years."
Whether this conceptual plan has survived contact with the enemy, I don't know
the code well enough to say. Comment #9 implies perhaps not, but its code
dump is over my head. Ingo knows the code a lot better than I do, so I leave
it to him to debate on the particulars.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40720>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
