Follow-up Comment #6, bug #67448 (group groff):

[comment #5 comment #5:]
> I would also note that the existence of the `lq` and `rq` strings is not a
> _groff_-ism.
[...]
> As far as I can tell, of _troff_s available to me that support a _man_
> package at all (which excludes _neatroff_), only Plan 9 from User Space seems
> not to include these strings.
[...]

Plan 9 from User Space [https://github.com/9fans/plan9port/pull/735 now
supports the `lq` and `rq` strings in its _man_ package].


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67448>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to