Follow-up Comment #5, bug #67838 (group groff): Branden, I've reviewed bug #67082 and can confirm that this bug's file #58003 attachment fixes the "Previoius" node error from "5.20.3 Using Fractional Type Sizes".
I agree with Dave's comment that "test[ing] all the links in the manual [is]
something worth doing but […] sounds tedious." I'm happy to volunteer doing
that if the following questions can be answered beforehand:
* What is groff's the minimum version requirement for texinfo?
* Could the minimum version requirement for texinfo be updated to 7.x if it's
lower? If yes, what would be the possible implications?
* Should the first (sub)subsection omit the previous node declaration, as it
currently is the same as the node's top node
* The manual seems to make inconsistent use of numbered and unnumbered
subsubsections, e.g. "4.6.3 Document Control Settings" has unnumbered
subsubsections, whereas "4.6.5 Body Text" contains numbered subsubsections.
Can all sub*sections be converted to numbered? If not what is the logic behind
numbered vs unnumbered subsubsections?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67838>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
