Follow-up Comment #4, bug #67830 (group groff):
Hi Branden,
thanks for taking the time to look at this an provide valuable feedback.
Yes, this is 3 different issues, apologies for not making it more clear in the
initial report.
I very much look forward to the result of your study of existing _mm_ i18n in
comparison to the arguments proposed in this patch. I really wasn't sure what
would feel right and appropriate. I went through several iterations, the final
of which is in the patch.
Glad to hear that you've been working on `C` register support, I think it's a
very useful feature. I was experimenting with the .cs request in order to be
able to use ordinary words for the draft text and spread it out. Thanks for
bringing the .tkf request to my attention it seems much more appropriate. I'm
happy to draft another patch if you think that is worthwhile doing.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67830>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
