Follow-up Comment #5, bug #68271 (group groff): At 2026-04-24T12:27:29-0400, Vincent Lefèvre wrote: > Follow-up Comment #4, bug #68271 (group groff): > > Hi, > > It is the fvwm package that is affected. As I've said at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1134776#10 the > concerned man page is Fvwm2Cpp(1).
Ah, I missed that--I wasn't CCed on it by the BTS for some reason, or it went to spam. Yup, I see that problem (and a couple of others, which reproduce with older versions of groff as well). > For instance, it has > > .IP VERSION > The X11 version. > > which yields > > VERSIONThe X11 version. I see. I see that fvwm3 no longer maintains man(7) documents in that format, instead employing AsciiDoc. https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm3/tree/main/doc Is Debian the de facto upstream maintainer for fvwm2? Do you know where I should best send patches addressing issues in fvwm 2's man pages? Regards, Branden _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68271> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
