Follow-up Comment #5, bug #68585 (group groff):
> Any such revision should involve a coupled check of both the allocation and
> deallocation sites
Yes, that's exactly how I did it: For each affected class field, I searched
for the allocation, i.e. where the relevant constructor argument came from,
and for the deallocation, i.e. where this field gets destructed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68585>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
