>>>>> Tom Tromey writes:
Tom> EXTRA_DATA shouldn't be defined since it is useless. Automake
Tom> doesn't examine _DATA variables statically, and hence has no
Tom> need for an EXTRA_DATA.
For consistency, would it be possible to make EXTRA_DATA a no-op? I
don't think Automake should be overly strict about this, since it is
basically a matter of style, and EXTRA_DATA conveys my intentions much
better than any of the other _DATA variables.
Thanks,
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
