Thanks for your comment.
From: Peter Åstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: the requirement for binutils
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 22:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
> Nasm is great, but I don't think it's appropiate for GRUB.
Could you explain why it is not appropriate for GRUB?
> become a stable version? I think using the beta version is OK. Maybe we
> can provide binary releases too, for novice users. I can fix RPMs.
I think it is enough to create the binary images for GNU/Linux and
GNU/Hurd, even if GRUB depends on beta releases. However, *BSD require
that a package should be created from a port in the standard
environments.
> Also, what is the status of Autoconf/Automake requirements? The same
> problem?
Yes, but they are not required unless you develop GRUB. So I don't
think the requirements are bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ^o-o^
http://duff.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~okuji (in English) m /
