From: Per Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Graphics support for Multiboot
Date: 02 Feb 2000 09:57:27 +0100

> Yes, I thought about that too. But since bits 16-31 indicate optional
> features, and this is really an optional field, I thought putting it
> there was better. What do you think?

  But there is no reason why the fields should be optional. Can you
think of anything that prevents an OS writer to put the extra space?
If you can disable the fields at ease just by setting them to zero, it
is no problem to always require them, I think.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
OKUJI Yoshinori  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>           ^o-o^
http://duff.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~okuji (in English)     m /

Reply via email to