On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> Why don't you read the doc? It is explicitly denoted that the
> command setup is just a wrapper. Use the command install directly if
> you want to specify file names. *sigh*
Sorry do you want to see the same error message without the wrapper
but the explicite line?
In the explicite line
install /boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) /boot/grub/stage2 p
are mentioned two files and which do you think is missing if you
get the message "File not found". Thought which do you think is
missing if `ls /boot/grub` shows them both? Even if someone doesn't
read the doc (don't bother me, I've did it twice!) should be
explained *which* file is missing. This is good programming style
and exactly corresponds to the bug description.
If there would be such verbosity, grub would have said:
File /boot/boot/grub/stage1 not found
*and*
File /boot/boot/grub/stage2 not found
This would have let me think over my partition concept to place /boot
on a separate partition which is obviousely suboptimal with the current
grub.
Kind regards
Andreas.
_______________________________________________
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
