On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:20:45AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > I'm afraid that you mistake it. GRUB itself does recover the status by > savedefault. It's good enough. The reason why I said that it would be > better to restore the original menu.lst was that the user might be > surprised if menu.lst is modified implicitly. > > And, overkill? Hmm, it's a personal taste. For me, having a new feature > only for boot only-once is overkill. Maintaining boot loader code is a > pain. Script programming is really easy and efficient. So I prefer to > have scripts rather than to make GRUB itself more complex.
Uhm.. I understand. Ok I'll play a bit with your script and see what I can do. Thanks! -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion) _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
