i like to inform i am using fedora 11 i installed grub 2 it works like a charm, my motherboard is S975XBX2. it mapped the bios settings itself.
thankyou hasan. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Bug-grub mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Bug-grub digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command > (Andrew Valencia) > 2. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command (Felix Zielcke) > 3. [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command > (Andrew Valencia) > 4. [bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work > (Andrew Valencia) > 5. [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to > /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't (Andreas Kloeckner) > 6. [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to > /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't (Felix Zielcke) > 7. grub 2 (difficulty, not a bug) (Roderick Worley) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:22 +0000 > From: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command > To: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]>, Felix Zielcke > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27862 (project grub): > > I think I've been using GRUB longer than you... this was the canonical way > to > specify arguments when VSTa first adopted GRUB. Admittedly, that was a > while > ago. Still, I hadn't guessed that you folks had not only switched to a > different way of specifying arguments, but had also made the old syntax > mean > something new. In any case, thanks for the quick response! > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:22:45 +0000 > From: Felix Zielcke <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command > To: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]>, Felix Zielcke > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27862 (project grub): > > I have no doubts that you used GRUB Legacy more then me ;) > Ok I even bothered now to try this actually out. > Strange that it really understands kernel=/x > The official manual at least tells nothing about this, according to grep > '=' > grub.texi > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862> > > _______________________________________________ > Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:26:29 +0000 > From: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command > To: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]>, Felix Zielcke > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27862 (project grub): > > Yeah, I'm a dinosaur. :-> > > Anyway, I really doubt people like me need to be well-served in what we > remember from the days of the 386. Thanks again for the quick response. > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27862> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:27:55 +0000 > From: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work > To: Andrew Valencia <[email protected]>, Felix Zielcke > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27863 (project grub): > > Thanks here too. Without the "=" it just quietly returns a prompt (just > like > with the "="). But, in fact, on a whim I tried "boot" and it had indeed > loaded in the bits. I don't know if it's intended that a kernel load in > CLI > mode should be absolutely silent, but it works so I'm happy. > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27863> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:06:09 +0000 > From: Andreas Kloeckner <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to > /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't > To: Andreas Kloeckner <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > URL: > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874> > > Summary: load_env and save_env default to > /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't > Project: GNU GRUB > Submitted by: inducer > Submitted on: Fr 30 Okt 2009 18:06:08 GMT > Category: None > Severity: Major > Priority: 5 - Normal > Item Group: None > Status: None > Privacy: Public > Assigned to: None > Originator Name: > Originator Email: > Open/Closed: Open > Discussion Lock: Any > Release: > Release: 1.96 > Reproducibility: Every Time > Planned Release: None > > _______________________________________________________ > > Details: > > If one wants to use grub-editenv, one needs to figure out which file is > used > to save and load the environment. This information is not easily > available--not in help load_env, nor anywhere. This information should be > available in the docs, but also grub-editenv should have the same default > as > load_env to alleviate the need for this piece of documentation in the first > place. > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874> > > _______________________________________________ > Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:50:45 +0000 > From: Felix Zielcke <[email protected]> > Subject: [bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to > /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't > To: Felix Zielcke <[email protected]>, Andreas Kloeckner > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 > > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #27874 (project grub): > > grub-editenv defaults now to /boot/grub/editenv too and it prints that out > with --help. > Unfortunately this was commited after the 1.97 release was made. > > I'm not sure about changing the help output for load_env > There it's actually $prefix/grubenv > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27874> > > _______________________________________________ > Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:09:03 +1100 > From: Roderick Worley <[email protected]> > Subject: grub 2 (difficulty, not a bug) > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'd like to be able to remove boot entries. > Currently, in my ubuntu9.10 system, the first Microsoft system to > appear is the first partition. > However if I select it, it wipes out my Vista system since it is the > "recovery" partition of my notebook. > However I'm told not to change grub.cfg > > Can you make an easy way of not having certain entries appear? > > Rod Worley > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-grub mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub > > > End of Bug-grub Digest, Vol 83, Issue 19 > **************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
