Fix the following warnings: $ ./autogen.sh configure.ac:375: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:355: grub_CHECK_ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK is expanded from... configure.ac:375: the top level configure.ac:378: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:435: grub_CHECK_PIE is expanded from... configure.ac:378: the top level configure.ac:386: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:382: grub_CHECK_STACK_PROTECTOR is expanded from... configure.ac:386: the top level configure.ac:392: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:401: grub_CHECK_STACK_ARG_PROBE is expanded from... configure.ac:392: the top level configure.ac:375: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:355: grub_CHECK_ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK is expanded from... configure.ac:375: the top level configure.ac:378: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:435: grub_CHECK_PIE is expanded from... configure.ac:378: the top level configure.ac:386: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:382: grub_CHECK_STACK_PROTECTOR is expanded from... configure.ac:386: the top level configure.ac:392: warning: AC_LANG_CONFTEST: no AC_LANG_SOURCE call detected in body ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:194: AC_LANG_CONFTEST is expanded from... aclocal.m4:401: grub_CHECK_STACK_ARG_PROBE is expanded from... configure.ac:392: the top level
Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle <j...@ringle.org> --- aclocal.m4 | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/aclocal.m4 b/aclocal.m4 index 6f9baf1..0860be7 100644 --- a/aclocal.m4 +++ b/aclocal.m4 @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ fi dnl Check if the C compiler generates calls to `__enable_execute_stack()'. AC_DEFUN(grub_CHECK_ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK,[ AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether `$CC' generates calls to `__enable_execute_stack()']) -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([[ +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ void f (int (*p) (void)); void g (int i) { @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ void g (int i) f (nestedfunc); } ]]) +]) if AC_TRY_COMMAND([${CC-cc} ${CFLAGS} -S conftest.c]) && test -s conftest.s; then true else @@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ AC_DEFUN(grub_CHECK_STACK_PROTECTOR,[ ssp_possible=yes] AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether `$CC' accepts `-fstack-protector']) # Is this a reliable test case? -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([[void foo (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }]]) +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[void foo (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }]])]) [# `$CC -c -o ...' might not be portable. But, oh, well... Is calling # `ac_compile' like this correct, after all? if eval "$ac_compile -S -fstack-protector -o conftest.s" 2> /dev/null; then] @@ -402,7 +403,7 @@ AC_DEFUN(grub_CHECK_STACK_ARG_PROBE,[ [# Smashing stack arg probe. sap_possible=yes] AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether `$CC' accepts `-mstack-arg-probe']) -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([[void foo (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }]]) +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[void foo (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }]])]) [if eval "$ac_compile -S -mstack-arg-probe -o conftest.s" 2> /dev/null; then] AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) [# Should we clear up other files as well, having called `AC_LANG_CONFTEST'? @@ -437,7 +438,7 @@ AC_DEFUN(grub_CHECK_PIE,[ pie_possible=yes] AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether `$CC' has `-fPIE' as default]) # Is this a reliable test case? -AC_LANG_CONFTEST([[ +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ #ifdef __PIE__ int main() { return 0; @@ -446,6 +447,7 @@ int main() { #error NO __PIE__ DEFINED #endif ]]) +]) [# `$CC -c -o ...' might not be portable. But, oh, well... Is calling # `ac_compile' like this correct, after all? -- 1.7.5.4 _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list Bug-grub@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub