At Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:14:37 +0200, K Okamoto wrote: > I searched gsl_max in the bug archives to no avail so I am guessing > this is the first time? In any event I found GSL_MAX to occasionally > give the wrong answer. Here's the code:
I've added a note to the manual: Note that the following macros perform multiple evaluations of their arguments, so they should not be used with arguments that have side effects (such as a call to a random number generator). Thanks for your email. -- Brian Gough GNU Scientific Library - http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
