At Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:38:10 +0100, JIA Pei wrote: > > Probably, if you transformed more levels, you lost more data. Because > wavelet can be looked on as a lossy compression, some times, if the users > would like to analyze the compression ratio and the quality of the > reconstructed images--- it's not that useful, but there might be such kind > of requirements. > > > So, is it possible that GSL affords the the "levels" as a public parameter?
I've made a note to export the dwt_step function in a future release. For now, I would recommend just copying the dwt.c source file into your application and modifying it, because it is self-contained. -- Brian Gough (GSL Maintainer) Support freedom by joining the FSF http://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/join_fsf?referrer=37 _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
