At Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:16:49 +0200, Claas H. =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6hler?= wrote: > FAIL: qawc(f459) elist (1.83292424966307774e-15 observed vs > 1.83308294820715351e-15 expected) [744] > FAIL: test > =================== > > Due to the relatively small relative error I am not sure whether this is a > bug > or not. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks for the bug report. Due to the smallness of the term, I believe it is safe to ignore the test failure. I will increase the tolerance of the test in the next release. -- Brian Gough (GSL Maintainer) Support freedom by joining the FSF http://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/join_fsf?referrer=37 _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
