At Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:12:33 +1200, tim wrote: > after your comments i have checked further. am i correct that there are > two different definitions of the third elliptic integral - one with 1 + > n and the other with 1 - n. In that case the result for -n from the > first type should match the result for n for the other type. which seems > to be the case. your result for -n matches keisan result for n and vice > versa.
Yes, it should be the same with the substitution n => -n. Thanks for checking that. _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
