At Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:13:01 -0500, Gunjan Verma wrote: > I guess the end result of this is that I still feel there is a > "logical" gap in that the GSL runtime assumes the presence of > gsl_isnan , but there is a theoretical possibility at least, that it > does not get defined at build time (if both flags are 0). I think > the solution to close this gap would be to refuse to build GSL if > both "have_isnan" and "have_ieee comparisons" are set to 0.
I've just added a final #else #error clause if the #ifdef's fail to define gsl_isnan or gsl_finite so at least the problem will be more obvious in future. -- Brian Gough GNU Scientific Library - http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
