At Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:43:43 +1100, John Gehman wrote: > I'm off my patch with respect to the inner workings of this, but I am > naively guessing that the same (or an analogous) bitmask has not been > implemented in the taus2 algorithm as for taus?
The difference between the two routines is very minor (only in the seeding) and they both use the bit mask. Did you send any details of the actual problem you saw? I don't remember seeing it. Also, did the library pass make check? -- Brian Gough _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
