At Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:52:41 +0300, Evgeny Kurbatov wrote: > > What do you think about returning NAN (instead of 0 and y0,yn) for > > values outside the range? It's a more obvious failure. > > You're right but I oriented on gsl_interp_eval_..._e functions and did > like that. Returning NaN is a good idea, though. It makes possible to > write a workaround to have any number as output instead of NaN. I > attached the patch to original interp.c.
I've applied that now with the original patches, thanks! _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
