Hello, I am trying to use the " gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1 ( double a, double b, double c, double x ) " function. I noticed that the results are wrong for positive x. Is this a known bug? If yes, do you plan to fix it?
Bests, Hatef _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
