On 05/17/2017 05:14 PM, Adam Majer wrote: > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=1 deriv2 i=102 (-1.42436215874661529e-16 > observed vs -1.42460074537287091e-16 expected) [9186711] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=1 deriv2 i=776 (1.85098628876862506e-16 > observed vs 1.85127865747637551e-16 expected) [9187385] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=-1 deriv2 i=102 (-1.42436215874661529e-16 > observed vs -1.42460074537287091e-16 expected) [15218755] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=-1 deriv2 i=776 (1.85098628876862506e-16 > observed vs 1.85127865747637551e-16 expected) [15219429] > [ 209s] FAIL test (exit status: 1) > [ 209s] > [ 209s] ./specfunc/test.log > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=1 deriv2 i=102 (-1.42436215874661529e-16 > observed vs -1.42460074537287091e-16 expected) [9186711] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=1 deriv2 i=776 (1.85098628876862506e-16 > observed vs 1.85127865747637551e-16 expected) [9187385] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=-1 deriv2 i=102 (-1.42436215874661529e-16 > observed vs -1.42460074537287091e-16 expected) [15218755] > [ 209s] FAIL: schmidt csphase=-1 deriv2 i=776 (1.85098628876862506e-16 > observed vs 1.85127865747637551e-16 expected) [15219429] > [ 209s] FAIL test (exit status: 1)
Just an update on this, the errors are actually caused inside the library not the test code. When the library is compiled with gcc 7.1.1+r247574 and the tests with 6.3.1+r246603, the failures are identical. - Adam
