Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I agree. Would you like a further patch for this, or will you just
> > change the 3 "while"s back to "if"s?
>
> Yep, I'll do the changes myself. The final patch then looks like a
> bug fix, where scm_delv_x and scm_delete_x is merely replaced by
> scm_delq_x, right?
I'm not up-to-date on what you're talking about, but since you mention
removing *one* item, it seems like you should use scm_delq1_x instead
of scm_delq_x.
/mdj
