> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 23 Mar 2001 09:07:32 +0000
>
> >>>>> "Neil" == Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander> The change which broke guile documentation is that
> Alexander> [...]
>
> Neil> I'm planning to try fixing this, mainly this Friday.
>
> Hmm... This is harder than I thought to fix elegantly. Two reasons
> suggest that it would be _wrong_ to try to use Guile to replace the
> Awk step here:
>
> (1) Guile startup time being quite slow.
>
> (2) Regexps are an optional feature when configuring Guile, so it
> seems unwise to assume that regexp and string matching procedures
> would be available.
>
> Any thoughts or ideas?
(1) We could change the build stuff to fire up Guile once, and snarf
all .x and .doc files in one run. That would probably break
incremental building, though.
(2) It's not only that we can't depend on regexp functions, we cannot
depend that Guile is available at all, I think.
A possibility would be to distribute the .x and .doc files, and only
regenerate them if the corresponding .c files are changed. I f that's
a good idea, I don't know.
What about running some snarfing script (awk or guile) over the C
sources instead of the output of the C preprocessor? The format of
the C files (comments, SCM_DEFINEs etc.) is well suited for parsing.
(not that I tried it already, though...)
Regards,
'martin
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
