Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It'll be easier to review if you post independent changes separately, > showing the new text.
Agreed. > > * scheme-control.texi (while do): Continue converting to active > > voice. > > I wouldn't worry about that sort of thing, not unless it's really > unclear. I don't know about that, but the named let section and do section were suddenly much clearer after I converted them. I suppose those two would qualify for that criteria, but I seem only able to tell in hindsight, that is after changing the voice, and it is *always* an improvement. That's why I just swept the text. > > * scheme-control.texi (begin): Added note about begin's > > uselessness. > > Well, it's only sometimes not required. If you want to add something, > then perhaps a typical use in an `if'. Just kidding :) > > Untabified. > > Fixed result indication in call-with-values example. > > Thanks, I applied these bits. I assume you want me to repropose the remainder of the changes on guile-devel, as suggested earlier? -- Stephen Compall or s11 or sirian The study of non-linear physics is like the study of non-elephant biology. BROMURE national information infrastructure Indigo event security clandestine nuclear benelux Soviet Capricorn e-cash Roswell Leuken-Baden AVN quarter bemd _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
