Hi Andy, Please reply through the bug tracker <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?29574>. The patch is there.
Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes: > Did you see Dybvig's paper about underflow and overflow handlers? That > does solve this problem in a more robust way, including allowing for > stack extension instead of thrown exceptions. Of course that's probably > a larger project. I just glanced at “Representing Control in the Presence of First-Class Continuations”. The idea of having linked stack segments sounds interesting and more flexible than what I suggested. Needs more thought... Thanks, Ludo’.
