On Tue 08 Mar 2011 00:10, Michael Ellis <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks for the education, Andy, and congrats again on the guile > compiler implementation. Your version handily outperforms the fastest > python implementation I know. Thanks, but there is still a ways to go. If guile can count to 10 million in half a second, that means it's spending 100+ cycles per loop, when it could be spending 5 or something. I figure we have a good factor of 4 to squeeze out easily with native compilation, and more with flow analysis and untagging and such. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
