Ok, I'm not using this at the moment so I can wait for master to become guile-2.2.
I do not know yet why this complexity is needed though (I asked on the racket channel but could not make anything useful out of the comments) Best to leave it as you suggest. /Regards Stefan On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > On Sun 11 Mar 2012 12:47, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <[email protected]> > writes: > > > ;;This shows that f rebounds to yield #t but the info returns %f > > (eq? > > (fluid-let-syntax ((f (lambda x #'#t))) > > (pk (f 1)) > > (info f)) > > %f) > > This is by design. This is as in Racket, where there is a difference > between syntax-local-value and syntax-parameter-value. In master, there > is an additional parameter to resolve-identifier, > `resolve-syntax-parameters?'. > > Suggestion: if you want this, add a similar parameter to psyntax.scm in > stable-2.0, and in both branches plumb it through to a keyword argument > on syntax-local-binding. Update the docs, too :) You had the > beginnings of a patch on bug 10992. > > Thanks! > > Andy > -- > http://wingolog.org/ >
