[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > However, it’s fundamentally wrong to rely on eq? to compare numbers. So > the test case you mention seems buggy, to start with.
Agreed. I removed the buggy test.
Thanks,
Mark
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of literals (... Daniel Hartwig
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of liter... Ludovic Courtès
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of l... Andy Wingo
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of l... Mark H Weaver
- bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-ness of nu... Daniel Hartwig
- bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-ness o... Daniel Hartwig
- bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-ness o... Mark H Weaver
- bug#13741: [PATCH] test-suite: eq-n... Mark H Weaver
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness of l... Daniel Hartwig
- bug#13741: guile-2.0: optimize, and eq-ness ... Mark H Weaver
