On 10 March 2013 01:11, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote: > Daniel Hartwig: >> and when read-char and peek-char return the former >> value it is only to signal a _current_ lack of characters and should >> not be considered part of the character stream read from the port. > > If I understand you correctly, that sounds more like "char-ready?".
Erm yes, my mistake.