On 10 March 2013 01:11, David A. Wheeler <dwhee...@dwheeler.com> wrote:
> Daniel Hartwig:
>> and when read-char and peek-char return the former
>> value it is only to signal a _current_ lack of characters and should
>> not be considered part of the character stream read from the port.
>
> If I understand you correctly, that sounds more like "char-ready?".

Erm yes, my mistake.



Reply via email to