Matt Sicker <[email protected]> skribis: > On 28 November 2013 13:35, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Doesn’t Clang still define __GNUC__? If it does, then it has to behave >> like GCC, and thus nothing Clang-specific needs to be added. >> > > Yeah, turns out it's a different issue.
Thanks for letting us know. I’m closing the bug now. Ludo’.
