Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
> How about changing the first formal argument name to 'template-id' and
> changing the words "syntax object" to "identifier"?
>
> Thanks!
> Mark
Sure, updated patch attached.
Taylan
>From 2ba9474dc8e2a56524d8c6c2f640fb3fb35b2d14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
<taylanbayi...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:24:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Amend datum->syntax documentation.
* doc/ref/api-macros.texi (Syntax Case): Make it clear that the first
argument to datum->syntax must be an identifier.
---
doc/ref/api-macros.texi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/api-macros.texi b/doc/ref/api-macros.texi
index c2910a4..a828258 100644
--- a/doc/ref/api-macros.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/api-macros.texi
@@ -616,9 +616,9 @@ won't have access to the binding of @code{it}.
But they can, if we explicitly introduce a binding via @code{datum->syntax}.
-@deffn {Scheme Procedure} datum->syntax for-syntax datum
+@deffn {Scheme Procedure} datum->syntax template-id datum
Create a syntax object that wraps @var{datum}, within the lexical context
-corresponding to the syntax object @var{for-syntax}.
+corresponding to the identifier @var{template-id}.
@end deffn
For completeness, we should mention that it is possible to strip the metadata
--
2.5.0
