On Fri 17 Jul 2015 01:00, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
>> Alternatively, the (system foreign) module in guile could provide a >> simple low-level wrapper around lt_dlopen, and possibly implement >> the higher level functionality of `dynamic-link' (additional search >> paths, guessing extensions etc.) in scheme. >> > +1 Either one of yall want to give a shot at this or something like it? I think in an ideal world we could lose the ltdl dependency. I gave a first crack at it but got mired in C; I never considered implementing it in Scheme, which seems like a nice idea. Andy
